DOGS ARE COLOUR BLIND ???
Dogs CAN see in colour: Scientists dispel the
myth that canines can only see in black and white
·
Russian scientists found that dogs have a limited colour
range in their vision
·
Canines use these colours to distinguish between items
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
There's a common misconception that dogs can
only see in monochrome and use varying brightness levels to identify the
outlines of items.
Yet Russian scientists have now proved not only
do dogs have a limited colour range, they use this visual spectrum to
distinguish between objects and select certain items from a line-up.
Previously, dog trainers would avoid using
coloured objects when training pets to do certain tasks, but these findings
could improve how animals are trained and what they are capable of learning.
For decades, scientists believed dogs could only see in monochrome and used brightness levels - whether something looked lighter or darker next to another object - to identify outlines of items. However, last year scientist Jay Neitz from the university of washington, carried out experiments on dogs to test this theory.
Human eyes have three cones that detect colour and can identify red, blue, green and yellow wavelengths created by light entering the eye.
Neitz discovered that dogs only have two cones - this means they can distinguish blue and yellow but not red and green.
This is the same spectrum seen by humans when they have colour blindness.
A team of researchers from the Laboratory of
Sensory Processing at the Russian
Academy of Sciences
tested the sight of eight dogs of varying sizes and breeds.
They wanted to expand on the work from the University of Washington last year.
Scientist Jay Neitz from the American university
carried out experiments on dogs to test whether they could see in colour or
not.
He discovered that while human eyes have three
'cones' that detect colour and can identify red, blue, green and yellow light;
dogs only have two.
This means dogs can distinguish blue and yellow,
but not red and green.
The Russian scientists therefore printed four
pieces of paper in different colours; dark yellow, dark blue, light yellow and
light blue.
The dark and light hues were used to test the
theory that dogs use brightness levels to distinguish between items.
In the first test, researchers took a dark
yellow and light blue sheet of paper, as well as a dark blue and light yellow
combination and put them in front of food bowls placed inside locked boxes.
They then unlocked one of the boxes and put the
dark yellow piece of paper in front of the box containing a piece of raw meat
in each trial.
Each test involved the dogs being allowed to try
to open one box before being taken away.
It only took three trials for the dogs to learn
which colour paper was sat in front of the box containing the raw meat.
Once the dogs could identify that a piece of
dark yellow paper meant meat was nearby, the researchers wanted to check
whether the animals were choosing this paper because of its brightness or its
colour.
To do this they put the dark blue paper in front
of one box and light yellow in front of another.
If the dogs chose the dark blue paper, the
scientists could rule that the animals were making choices based on brightness.
However, if they chose the light yellow paper,
the choices were based on colour.
Each dog chose the light yellow paper - meaning
they were making choices based on colour - more than 70 per cent of the time.
Six out of the eight dogs made the colour choice
between 90 and 100 per cent of the time.
In conclusion, the researchers said: 'We show
that for eight previously untrained dogs colour proved to be more informative
than brightness when choosing between visual stimuli differing both in
brightness and chromaticity.
'Although brightness could have been used by the
dogs in our experiments, it was not.
'Our results demonstrate that under natural
photopic lighting conditions colour information may be predominant even for
animals that possess only two spectral types of cone photoreceptors.'
This article was published in the Daily Mail on 23rd July 2013.
Comments
Post a Comment